Why faces are and are not special




















Recently viewed 0 Save Search. Are Faces Special? Oxford Handbook of Face Perception. Read More. Your current browser may not support copying via this button. Subscriber sign in You could not be signed in, please check and try again. Username Please enter your Username. Password Please enter your Password. These experiments are consistent with the view that experts represent items in memory in terms of distinguishing features of a different kind than do novices.

Speculations as to the type of feature used and neuropsychological and developmental implications of this accomplishment are offered. Abstract Recognition memory for faces is hampered much more by inverted presentation than is memory for any other material so far examined. Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper.

Face Breeding Canis familiaris photograph. Citation Type. Has PDF. Publication Type. More Filters. Becoming a face expert. Young children do not form representations of newly encountered faces as efficiently as do adults. A first step in explaining this difference, like any age-related change, is locating its source. A … Expand.

View 2 excerpts, cites background. Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children. Abstract Adult face recognition is severely hampered by stimulus inversion.

Several investigators have attributed this vulnerability to the effect of orientation on encoding relational aspects of … Expand. It has been proposed that the processing of faces is a highly specialized function that is separate from the processing of other types of objects. Evidence for this appears with inversion, where it … Expand. How we can change your mind: anodal tDCS to Fp3 alters human stimulus representation and learning. Neuropsychologia , — Busigny, T. Acquired prosopagnosia abolishes the face inversion effect.

Cortex 46 , — Farah, M. The inverted face Inversion effect in prosopagnosia: evidence for mandatory, face-specific perceptual mechanisms. Stanislaw, H. Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Methods Instrum. Kaplan, H. Dienes, Z. Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: which side are you on?. Jeffreys, H. An associative theory of the representation of stimuli: applications to perceptual learning and latent inhibition.

Morris, R. Oxford University Press, Oxford, An elemental model of associative learning: Latent inhibition and perceptual learning. Elemental representation and configural mappings: combining elemental and configural theories of associative learning.

Perceptual learning for a familiar category under inversion: An analogue of face inversion? Carlson, C. Shipley Eds. Zhao, M. Beyond faces and expertise: facelike holistic processing of nonface objects in the absence of expertise. Maurer, D. The many faces of configural processing. Trends Cognit.

Tremblay, S. The uncertain outcome of prefrontal tDCS. Ambrus, G. The enhancement of cortical excitability over the DLPFC before and during training impairs categorization in the prototype distortion task. Neuropsychologia 49 , — Mackintosh eds Trobalon, J. University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Kincses, T.

Facilitation of probabilistic classification learning by transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex in the human. Neuropsychologia 42 , — Fregni, F. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neuroreport 16 , — Beeli, G. Modulating presence and impulsiveness by external stimulation of the brain. Brain Funct. Boggio, P. Modulation of emotions associated with images of human pain using anodal transcranial direct current stimulation tDCS.

Neuropsychologia 47 , — Plewnia, C. Cortex 49 , — Ohn, S. Time-dependent effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on the enhancement of working memory.

NeuroReport 19 , 43—47 Fertonani, A. Naming facilitation induced by transcranial direct current stimulation. Brain Res. Javadi, A. Transcranial direct current stimulation tDCS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex modulates declarative memory. Elmer, S. Direct current induced short term modulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex while learning auditory presented nouns.

Jeon, S. Improvement of the working memory and naming by transcranial direct current stimulation. Download references. You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar. Testing and data collection were performed by C. M performed the data analysis and interpretation of the results. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript for submission. Correspondence to Ciro Civile or I. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.

If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. Reprints and Permissions. Sci Rep 11, Download citation.

Received : 29 September Accepted : 08 February Published : 23 February Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:. Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative.

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advanced search. Skip to main content Thank you for visiting nature. Download PDF. Subjects Cognitive neuroscience Human behaviour Learning and memory Psychology. Abstract We believe we are now in a position to answer the question, " Are faces special? Materials Experiment 1a used a set of face images 5. Figure 1. Full size image. Figure 2.

Figure 3. Experiment 1b For Experiment 1b we conducted the same Bayes analyses as that for Experiment 1a but this time using as priors the means from the results obtained in Civile et al.

General discussion In the two experiments here reported we investigated the effects of a particular tDCS procedure applied to the robust inversion effect typically found for faces Experiment 1a and that found for non-mono-orientated sets of stimuli checkerboards which participants have been familiarised with Experiment 1b.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000