Why shoot 4k

Want to zoom in on that tigers teeth but you shot it on a prime lens? Set some key frames and scale it in post. Not quite, but this feature does seem to reveal itself as 2 very different attitudes:.

More options means more creativity with my shots. Think of it like this: always shoot in 4K just in case you have better ideas in post. Ah, the jello effect. Guess what, 4K is like rocket fuel for stabilizers. During its analysis the stabilizer is looking for obvious details in the image that it can track. This should allow recording at quality settings up to around mbps. Memory cards aren't quite as expensive as they once were, but high-speed cards still represent a significant investment, and one that needs to be factored in to the cost of a new 4K-capable camera.

Storing all that data for editing also means a fast, high-capacity hard drive. You'll need at least a rpm conventional hard drive on a USB 3. It depends. In the same way as 4K video requires a lot of space to physically store, it also requires a lot more processing power to handle it when it comes to editing the footage. As always when looking at computer performance, the main things to consider are processor speed, the graphics card, how much RAM is installed, and the type and capacity of hard drive.

You'll soon know if your computer isn't up to the task of editing 4K video. But even if you're having issues, you may be able to get by editing proxy footage offline as opposed to the actual original footage online. It is possible to shoot, edit and publish a 4K video project without ever viewing the footage on a 4K monitor, but we wouldn't recommend it. IPS panels are superior when it comes to color accuracy at different viewing angles.

If you already have a color-accurate monitor, you can go with an additional, more budget-oriented 4K monitor for cutting footage together, and continue doing color grading on the older monitor. Editing lower resolution footage then exporting to 4K is one option. Editing 4K footage doesn't just require a powerful computer, you'll also need specialized video editing software.

There are plenty of video editing suites out there, and 4K support is becoming more common even for inexpensive options like Apple's iMovie. Just be aware that different cameras shoot video in different ways, and different video editing software interacts with these file formats in different ways too, so you should do some research to find which software will work best with your footage. Let's say you've produced your prize-winning 4K content and are ready to share it with the world.

But before you do that, here are some things to think about. If you want or need to share your work in full-resolution 4K you can easily share the files directly via your prefered online cloud storage service, but depending on your Internet connection speed, upload and download times will probably be very lengthy. Finally, consider: do you even need to output in 4K? As we said in the introduction to this article, HD video is great, and it's fine for most purposes. There are some huge advantages to shooting and editing 4K, but when it comes to sharing your work, 4K might be overkill.

If you output as HD, file sizes will be significantly smaller for one thing, and you won't need a UHD screen to view the footage at its full resolution. Even if you output HD though, you should always save a 'futureproof' full-resolution 4K version to disk.

Supported by. The difference between the two was drastic. Even on a camera with more p capability than 4k, the final video looks almost four times sharper! To cut the chase, the simple fact is that 4k shooting squishes 4 times more resolution into the same shot than p.

Video production is all about creativity. The more options you have while shooting, the better your final video cuts will be. As an independent film-maker, I have come to learn that 4k gives you more field to pan, change depth, change the view and to seamlessly mesh all your different pans into one. This means that I often have more different camera views, angles and sights when shooting in 4k than I would have when doing the same in p.

I know we said it earlier; editing 4k videos might be harder, especially if you are using an old computer. In case you require post motion stabilization which everyone thinks about, the fact that 4k videos are more detailed means that your editing software will get more inconsistencies to correct than what you would have with p videos. Besides video stabilization, motion tracking with 4k videos is also easier. This too comes from the fact that 4k videos have way more data per frame than p.

If you are a client-centric videographer like me, you know that some clients need a great video, and good still shots in the same package. After all, you can grab interesting still shots from the video. Just like with video resolution, still grabs from 4k videos have more depth, more color, clarity, and depth than p ones.

He has to choose the correct AMA plugin in order for the footage to relink correctly. I ended up getting an external recorder, the Atomos Ninja Flame, which can record to 4K. This was due to my ignorance. I misread an article about using Atomos with C I was able to fit all the footage recorded for my movie onto a 6 TB Hard Drive. I believe if I shot the entire movie in 4K it would have doubled the budget for file storage. Of course, I made multiple copies of the footage on separate back up hard drives.

Shooting HD made my storage and editing workflow fairly seamless and one of the least stressful parts of the process. Another reason I decided to shoot with the external recorder was that the Pro Res HD files gave more latitude in color correction rather than using the C Log footage directly form the C Shooting 4K would have given me the most latitude involving color correction and VFX, but it also would have allowed me to push in on images more without losing too much resolution.

During the editing of my movie, I needed to fix some compositions by pushing into the image. This is very similar to cropping a photo. You can zoom into the image and make the subject appear larger in the frame or you can zoom in and orient the subject where you originally intended. We shot on a 35mm Rokinon cinema prime lens. We lit the scene using only ambient city light. The ISO was set to All of these decisions I made with regards to 4K versus p HD were made in relation to my small independent film.

When we screened my feature at a movie theater from a p Blu Ray, the image was fantastic on the big screen. The cinematographers and the gearheads who attended the screening assumed it was shot in 4K. We shot on a 50mm Rokinon cinema prime lens. The lights were wrapped in pink and green gels to give the overall light a neon look that matched the rest of the movie. This scene was shot with a 50mm Rokinon cinema prime lens. We lit the scene with ambient city light and one key light hanging off the fire escape to the left of the frame.

We used heavy diffusion on the key light here. If you are really trying to make a movie on a small budget, which hopefully means you wrote a story appropriate for a small budget, then I think p will get you to the finish line. I believe the more important question to consider is what is the best camera and lensing for your story. Here are a few other options for folks also working on small budgets and who need a smooth file-handing workflow.

I used the C Mark II for my project but if you want to save even more money and get some of the same features, this C sports…. You are not limited to only these choices, however!